|
|
|
| |
 |
UALR College of Business
2801 South University
Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204-1099
t: (501) 569-3356
f: (501) 569-8898 |
|
 |
| (Progress Report Submitted in 2006) |
| |
| |
The Management Information Systems program develops competencies in analysis, design, development, and management of business information systems. Emphasis is on the development of computer application in a business environment and the effective use of computer resources to meet business objectives. Students receive hands-on experience with client-server technologies through lab-based and independent projects. |
| |
| |
The MIS Program is designed to develop professionals capable of fulfilling a variety of important roles in the development and management of information systems in business and industry. Specifically, the MIS program is designed to develop student intellect through expanding knowledge and analytical abilities in the development and use of information systems.
In addition, the program prepares students to serve and strengthen society by enhancing awareness particularly in the technical arena and to promote humane sensitivities and understanding of the interdependence of individuals, organizations, and nations – particularly as these issues relate to information and information systems. |
| |
assessment home | top |
| |
| 1 |
To demonstrate the uses of appropriate system analysis methodologies to develop information systems that meet user needs.
Assessment is determined by the student's exhibiting an ability (using structured analysis methodology and CASE tools) to complete a systems analysis and design project encompassing data analysis (including entity-relationship diagrams, data mapping, and data normalization), and process analysis (including data flow diagrams). |
2 |
To demonstrate good verbal skills.
Fulfilling this requirement will be determined by the students' ability to effectively deliver a verbal presentation using appropriate information technology tools. They must be skilled in communicating technical information in a non-technical end-user environment. |
| 3 |
To demonstrate the uses of appropriate system design methodologies to develop information systems that meet user needs.
Assessment is determined by the student's exhibiting an ability to completely design a system or a subsystem. Design related projects (of students) from various courses will be assessed for each of the following design activities: file/database design, LAN Physical design, input-output design, and user interface design. |
4 |
To demonstrate good written communication skills.
Fulfilling this requirement will be determined by the students' ability to effectively communicate in the written medium such as term papers, and research reports. They must be skilled in communicating technical information in a non-technical end-user environment as well. |
| 5 |
To design and implement business data management systems.
Assessment of student fulfillment of this goal will be determined by exhibiting an ability to use the Entity Relationship diagram to capture user-needs, have knowledge of relational database operators, file organizations, implement a database using a graphical user interface as well as the SQL database query language, data normalization techniques and manipulating data using Cobol. The student will demonstrate the above knowledge in a instructor specified environment. |
6 |
To demonstrate good group communication skills
Fulfilling this requirement will be determined by the students' ability to effectively work in team-based work environments, which are common in the information systems field |
| 7 |
To apply foundational concepts of client-server computing in the development and administration of such systems.
Fulfilling this goal will be determined by exhibiting ability to physically and technically design a local area network (including internetworking capability), manage objects, use LAN utilities, enact security/control systems, customize a user environment (front-end design), and apply advanced software application competencies including the Internet. |
8 |
To understand the use of IT as a strategic resource.
Fulfilling this requirement will be determined by the students' ability to explain the role of IT in strategy formulation, which could be done via written examinations, verbal presentations, course assignments and/or case analysis. . |
| |
assessment home | top |
| |
| |
Program Objectives Assessed
This Year
One student learning objective was assessed this year:
To understand the use of IT as a strategic resource.
Assessment this year focuses on specific components of strategic
use of IT skills:
Use of IT as a Strategic Resource
- Knowledge of IT Portfolio and its Relationship with Corporate
Strategy.
- Knowledge of Different Views of Appropriate Relationship
between IT and Corporate Strategy.
Procedures Used to Collect Data and Rationale
Student projects were obtained from all students completing
Management 4331, a required course for all MIS majors. Students
must have junior standing to take 4331; therefore students
complete 4331 in their junior or senior year. A random sample
of student’s answers on exam questions from the Fall
2005 semester were evaluated.
Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating Data
The student projects were assessed individually by a team
of faculty members with sufficient strategic use of IT skills.
Using Primary Trait Analysis on exams is a strong assessment
technique. The exams are evaluated using the criteria illustrated
in Appendix A. The faculty identified issues of concern relating
to the student performance which were presented to a team
of business representatives and students for additional evaluation/input.
MIS students that completed Management 4331 and MIS Advisory
Board members with strategic use of IT were presented the
results of the 2005 assessment and a newly designed rubric.
The stakeholders were asked for recommendations to improve
the program based on the assessment results.
Reliability and Validity of Method
The evaluative rubric was newly created for assessment this
year. External evaluators (advisory council members) have
evaluated content validity of the rubrics. Prior to assessing
the exams, MIS faculty met to discuss the assessment process
to assure clear and consistently applied evaluation standards
and similarly interpreted the evaluation criteria. A team
of two evaluators conducted independent reviewers of each
portfolio item. The assessment coordinator verified that the
agreement between the evaluators was acceptable. The scoring
guide is shown in appendix B.
|
| |
assessment home | top |
| |
| |
The results of the Primary Trait
Analysis are shown in Appendix C. An acceptable total rating
of 50 was established.
IT Corporate Strategies Competencies
The competencies centered on the following:
- Ability to communicate the steps necessary to create
a strategic IT portfolio.
- Ability to communicate how to use an IT portfolio to
create a competitive advantage.
- Ability to communicate the importance of the fit between
IT strategy and corporate strategy.
- Ability to communicate value of IT capital expenditures
for strategic advantage.
Analysis of Findings
- Students’ understanding of the intricate details
on the ongoing debate over the proper role of IT in relation
to corporate strategy was inadequate.
- Students’ ability to demonstrate proper use of vocabulary
and discourse structures of the discipline in relation IT
and corporate strategy were insufficient.
- Students were able to demonstrate reasoning behind and
knowledge of steps required to successfully assembly and
manage the IT portfolio.
- Students understood the relationship between IT portfolio
and corporate strategy.
Student Feedback
As we do every year, MIS majors were presented the results
of the 2005 Strategic user of IT assessment results and asked
to provide their interpretation. Students believed that provision
of the new rubric would improve performance. The students
can use the rubrics as a study guide to better focus their
analysis while looking at cases.
Curricular Recommendations Based on These Assessment
Results
- Syllabus changes to the MGMT 4331 class to include more
reading to stress proper use of vocabulary and discourse
structures when discussing IT corporate strategy. The original
syllabus from Fall 2005 is shown is appendix D. The changed
appendix is shown in appendix E.
- Place more emphasis in class discussions and additional
readings in the Wall Street Journal on the ongoing debate
over the proper role of IT in corporate strategy.Benchmarking
of MIS Majors’ Business Core Assessment
Performance of MIS majors on the ETS Business Core Exam during
past years (score is number correct out of 200):
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
144.0 |
143.6 |
151.4 |
151.0 |
Exam not taken (offered
in Spring 2006) |
Exam not taken (offered in Spring 2006) |
149.0 |
146.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assessment home | top |
| |
| |
Faculty Involvement in Process
Throughout the year assessment findings, activities, and
process were discussed in departmental faculty meetings. Each
MIS faculty member participated in assessment data analysis,
interpretation, and process refinement.
a) In April faculty define programmatic changes that will
be implemented in fall semester.
b) In April and August faculty refine assessment process,
including techniques for measuring accomplishment of student
learning objectives.
c) In February faculty analyze and interpret collected assessment
data.3. Involvement of Other Stakeholders
Industry
The MIS Business Advisory Council has participated in identifying
and refining the program goals and needed student competencies
for the MIS program. In addition, business representatives
participate in rubric construction/validation and in evaluating
assessment data.
Students
Like past years, student participation was achieved in evaluating
assessment data—reviewed and evaluated written reports.
Student feedback on the newly developed rubric was also obtained.
Assessment findings were presented to MIS majors; their interpretation
of the findings and career implications were requested. These
additional data provided insight valuable in interpreting
the assessment findings. |
| |
assessment home | top |
|
 |
 |
|
Home · Academic Departments · Graduate Programs · Assessment · Site Map · Search
Executive MBA · Evening MBA |
|
Copyright © 2003 All rights Reserved
|
|
|